We welcomed the news earlier this month when it was announced that four Klamath River dams would be removed by 2020. The Agreement-in-Principle between PacifiCorp, the states of Oregon and California and federal agencies ensures that dam removal will move forward as envisioned by one of three companion settlement agreements that were signed by local stakeholders in 2010 and 2014.
CalTrout sees this as a critical step, but not the only step, in bolstering fish runs and sustaining communities in the Klamath Basin. (Read CalTrout encouraged by first step in path forward for Klamath). The three Klamath Agreements included not only plans for dam removal, but also an elaborate plan to divvy up limited water supplies while providing for environmental restoration throughout the basin. The package of negotiated Agreements required Congressional approval in order to take full effect. Unfortunately, the Agreement that provided for the majority of environmental restoration throughout the watershed – the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA) – expired on December 31, 2015 without a vote from Congress. (For the history of the Agreements, read Klamath Crumbles in the December 2015 issue of The Current.)
The Klamath Agreements have been hailed for years as a model for developing a local solution to allocating limited water supplies in the West. Unfortunately, a small group of hardline conservatives, including Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR), blocked the passage of legislation that would have enacted the Agreements. The lack of action from Congress before the KBRA expired threatened the entire package of agreements. But earlier this year PacifiCorp and other key stakeholders decided to amend the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement to find an alternative path for dam removal even though the full package of agreements can no longer move forward.
Some conservation groups and tribes are pleased with the current outcome. With the removal of four aging hydroelectric dams from the river, imperiled salmon and steelhead will regain access to 250 miles of spawning and rearing habitat. While improving fish passage is an essential step in recovering these native fish populations, however, it is just one piece of the recovery puzzle.
CalTrout continues to be a participating party in this new effort to amend the KHSA and supports the full package of terms that were negotiated by conservationists, commercial fishermen, tribes, farmers and ranchers, and state, local and federal agencies. Together, the three Klamath Agreements provided for environmental, cultural and economic sustainability throughout the Klamath Basin. While we celebrate the possibilities dam removal provides, we will continue to support efforts to implement as many of the bargained-for benefits as possible that were identified in the full settlement package. After all, at CalTrout we are firm believers that what’s good for the river is good not only for fish, but also for people.
Warm regards,
Thank you for your interest in the Eel River Forum! We looking forward to sharing meeting updates and other info from the Eel River watershed with you as they develop.
Sign up to hear from California Trout! CalTrout’s mission is to ensure healthy waters and resilient wild fish for a better California. Hear about our work and how to get involved through our monthly newsletter, The Streamkeeper’s Blog, “Trout Clout” action alerts, article from our e-magazine, The Current, event invites, and much more! We respect your privacy and will never sell or share your information with other organizations.
Thank you for your interest in Big Chico Creek and the Iron Canyon Fish Passage Project! We looking forward to sharing project updates, news, and stories with you from the Big Chico Creek watershed as they develop.
Thank you for your interest in Big Chico Creek and the Iron Canyon Fish Passage Project! One of our staff members will do their best to get back to you as soon as possible. However, please note that due to limited capacity we may not be able to respond to all questions or fulfill all requests.
Let us know if you are interested in volunteering and we will get in contact with you as soon as we can.
Thank you for your interest in the Elk River! One of our North Coast Region staff members will do their best to get back to you as soon as possible. However, please note that due to limited capacity we may not be able to respond to all questions or fulfill all requests.
Peter Moyle is the Distinguished Professor Emeritus in the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology and Associate Director of the Center for Watershed Sciences, at UC Davis. He is author or co-author of more than 240 publications, including the definitive Inland Fishes of California (2002). He is co-author of the 2017 book, Floodplains: Processes and Management for Ecosystem Services. His research interests include conservation of aquatic species, habitats, and ecosystems, including salmon; ecology of fishes of the San Francisco Estuary; ecology of California stream fishes; impact of introduced aquatic organisms; and use of floodplains by fish.
Robert Lusardi is the California Trout/UC Davis Wild and Coldwater Fish Researcher focused on establishing the basis for long-term science specific to California Trout’s wild and coldwater fish initiatives. His work bridges the widening gap between academic science and applied conservation policy, ensuring that rapidly developing science informs conservation projects throughout California. Dr. Lusardi resides at the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences and works closely with Dr. Peter Moyle on numerous projects to help inform California Trout conservation policy. His recent research interests include Coho salmon on the Shasta River, the ecology of volcanic spring-fed rivers, inland trout conservation and management, and policy implications of trap and haul programs for anadromous fishes in California.
Patrick Samuel is the Conservation Program Coordinator for California Trout, a position he has held for almost two years, where he coordinates special research projects for California Trout, including the State of the Salmonids report. Prior to joining CalTrout, he worked with the Fisheries Leadership & Sustainability Forum, a non-profit that supports the eight federal regional fishery management councils around the country. Patrick got his start in fisheries as an undergraduate intern with NOAA Fisheries Protected Resources Division in Sacramento, and in his first field job as a crew member of the California Department of Fish & Wildlife’s Wild and Heritage Trout Program.
2 Comments
It is unfortunate that Cal Trout continues to promote Klamath water deals which please politicians but are not in the interest of the River and Klamath Salmon. The core problem is that under these deals irrigators get a fixed water allocation up front but in order for salmon to get restoration flows, willing sellers of water rights must be found and irrigation efficiency measures which have never resulted in more water in the Klamath River must suddenly produce a vast amount of water for fish.
Even if they were achievable under the KBRA water deal, which they are not, the flows salmon need would take decades to materialize. And right now most of the juvenile salmon migrating down the Klamath are diseased and only a small fraction live to make it to the ocean. And yet Cal Trout touts deals that will keep things this way for many years while refusing to challenge the biological opinion that is killing most of the young salmon right now.
One has got to wonder how an organization that once upon a time focused like a spotlight on what fish need became an organization that cares more about politics and pleasing politicians.
Felice,
You are entitled to your opinion, but there is a good reason why the groups that care about fish support the overall package–Karuk and Yurok tribes, commercial fisherman, CalTrout, Trout Unlimited, American River all support the flow package because it is best for fish.
The status quo is not working, time to try something new.