
Southern steelhead are more than just a native fish — they are a living measure of how well Southern California balances urban development with the health of its rivers. In one of the most urbanized and infrastructure-shaped landscapes in the country, their survival depends on whether we design, build, and restore with connectivity, water quality, and long-term resilience in mind. Tools like the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) play a critical role in ensuring that development accounts for environmental impacts before projects move forward. If Southern steelhead can thrive here, it means our policies, planning, and restoration efforts are working together to support both people and wildlife — and that recovery in even the most developed regions is possible.
Southern steelhead trout are one of the most remarkable native fish in California, an often overlooked species that inhabits the waters of our very own Southern California backyard. Known scientifically as Oncorhynchus mykiss, Southern steelhead are a distinct population of steelhead trout found in coastal watersheds from the Santa Maria River south to the U.S.–Mexico border. Unlike resident rainbow trout, steelhead are anadromous, meaning they spawn in inland freshwater streams, migrate to the ocean to grow, and return to freshwater rivers to spawn. In Southern California, their ability to survive in volatile, drought-prone watersheds with high temperatures, seasonal sand berms, and low summer flows is nothing short of extraordinary. Their persistence in some of the most urbanized waters in the state is a testament to the species’ resilience.

However, over the last century, Southern California has become one of the most densely populated regions in the country with development that can block their migration corridors and degrade the quality and expanse of their habitat. Over time, these environmental stressors can build on one another, steadily harming populations that were once stable. Today, they are found in only a fraction of their historical range, with scientists estimating their populations have declined by more than 90 percent from historical levels.
In a region that is shaped so heavily by infrastructure and development, the future of Southern steelhead is intertwined with the decisions and policies about how we build. The California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, is one of the main ways California evaluates development projects. Created in 1970, CEQA ensures that environmental consequences are considered before decisions are made or potentially environmentally harmful projects develop.
For Southern steelhead, this can mean assessing whether a new bridge design allows fish passage, if a development project would degrade water quality, or whether a flood control upgrade could be redesigned to maintain natural stream functions. CEQA does not automatically stop development, but rather creates a framework for mindful planning, requiring agencies to analyze alternatives, implement mitigation measures, and incorporate science into decision-making. That analysis is documented in publicly available reports, including Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) and Mitigated Negative Declarations (MNDs), which describe anticipated environmental impacts and how they will be avoided, minimized, or mitigated. By requiring this level of transparency, CEQA ensures that decisions are informed by data and open to public review before projects are approved. For a species that depends on connected, functional watersheds, these protections are life-saving.
California Trout works at the intersection of science, restoration, and policy to ensure Southern steelhead have a future in Southern California. We believe it’s possible to work towards cities and urban areas that support humans, fish, and wildlife. We are all connected and human communities will only flourish if we have healthy rivers and abundant native wildlife populations. Across the region, CalTrout partners with local agencies to remove fish passage barriers, modernize outdated infrastructure, and restore habitats so steelhead can once again move through their historic watersheds. Our restoration efforts are often intertwined with the CEQA process, where we work to ensure new projects strengthen river systems rather than fragment them. Public review and comment periods are an integral part of the CEQA process which gives community members, scientists, agencies and advocates the opportunity to weigh in on how they view projects will impact the environment. More public participation leads to higher levels of accountability on developers, which encourages meaningful and lasting mitigation measures.
When development decisions are grounded in science, and conservation is built into infrastructure from the start, there is room to support both growing communities and native fish. This more ecologically-friendly approach to city planning can take several forms: designing crossings that allow upstream migration, protecting riparian habitat, or restoring estuaries so fish can successfully transition between river and ocean. Creating solutions that benefit both humans and the fish is doable, sustainable, and cost-effective – we just need to make it a priority.
California Trout and our partners are working every day to reconnect fragmented habitat and improve fish passage, and that progress is made possible because of supporters who believe healthy waterways and thriving native fish are worth protecting. With careful planning and collective action, Southern steelhead can continue to return from the Pacific Ocean to the very streams that flow through our cities. Their presence is a reminder that the choices we make about our rivers matter, and that with sustained commitment, recovery is possible.

In the coming weeks, California Trout will launch an interactive StoryMap exploring how restoration, infrastructure, and environmental policy shape the future of Southern steelhead across the South Coast region. By bringing together science, planning, and place-based context, it will highlight what it takes to support connected, resilient watersheds in a highly developed landscape. The StoryMap will walk readers through how the CEQA process works in practice, explain the differences between EIRs, MNDs, and Notices of Exemption (NOEs), and clarify what different CEQA statuses mean for a project. It will also highlight when and how the public can participate in review and comment periods that influence outcomes for local rivers. Stay tuned for the launch!
Sign up to hear from California Trout! CalTrout’s mission is to ensure healthy waters and resilient wild fish for a better California. Hear about our work and how to get involved through our monthly newsletter, The Streamkeeper’s Blog, “Trout Clout” action alerts, article from our e-magazine, The Current, event invites, and much more! We respect your privacy and will never sell or share your information with other organizations.

Peter Moyle is the Distinguished Professor Emeritus in the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology and Associate Director of the Center for Watershed Sciences, at UC Davis. He is author or co-author of more than 240 publications, including the definitive Inland Fishes of California (2002). He is co-author of the 2017 book, Floodplains: Processes and Management for Ecosystem Services. His research interests include conservation of aquatic species, habitats, and ecosystems, including salmon; ecology of fishes of the San Francisco Estuary; ecology of California stream fishes; impact of introduced aquatic organisms; and use of floodplains by fish.
Robert Lusardi is the California Trout/UC Davis Wild and Coldwater Fish Researcher focused on establishing the basis for long-term science specific to California Trout’s wild and coldwater fish initiatives. His work bridges the widening gap between academic science and applied conservation policy, ensuring that rapidly developing science informs conservation projects throughout California. Dr. Lusardi resides at the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences and works closely with Dr. Peter Moyle on numerous projects to help inform California Trout conservation policy. His recent research interests include Coho salmon on the Shasta River, the ecology of volcanic spring-fed rivers, inland trout conservation and management, and policy implications of trap and haul programs for anadromous fishes in California.

Patrick Samuel is the Conservation Program Coordinator for California Trout, a position he has held for almost two years, where he coordinates special research projects for California Trout, including the State of the Salmonids report. Prior to joining CalTrout, he worked with the Fisheries Leadership & Sustainability Forum, a non-profit that supports the eight federal regional fishery management councils around the country. Patrick got his start in fisheries as an undergraduate intern with NOAA Fisheries Protected Resources Division in Sacramento, and in his first field job as a crew member of the California Department of Fish & Wildlife’s Wild and Heritage Trout Program.