“Times are changing in the world of salmon assessment on the Eel River as technology provides more accurate counts than people can, with sonar in the river and drones in the sky.” (Redheaded Blackbelt)
While salmon counts are low this year, having accurate information will better inform our conservation efforts.
CalTrout has been using a Sonar system to estimate abundance of spawning Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon, and steelhead on the South Fork Eel River with support from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Steelhead Report and Restoration Card Program.
The Sonar System (DIDSON) located 10 miles above the South Fork confluence with the Eel River records video of fish as they migrate upstream to their spawning grounds. We estimated 2,190 Chinook Salmon passed the Sonar during November and December 2019 compared to 3,800 Chinook Salmon seen in November and December 2018.
A second DIDSON Sonar station operated by CDFW, is located nearby on the mainstem Eel River above its confluence with the South Fork Eel River. Operations at both of these sites began in 2018-19. Together, these two stations provide salmonid escapement data for a large portion of the Eel River. CDFW estimated that 4,110 Chinook salmon migrated up the mainstem Eel River between November and early January 2020, versus 3,844 the year prior.
While fish counts are low, but hopes are high.
North Coast Fisheries Scientist Matthew Metheny recounts his experiences in the field:
Unfortunately, our preliminary estimates for 2019-2020 are noticeably lower than last year’s. We estimated 2,190 Chinook Salmon passed the Sonar during November and December 2019 compared to the 3,800 Chinook Salmon seen in November and December 2018. The preliminary estimates for Coho salmon and steelhead during the months of January and February 2020 are a little better, at about 2/3 of the count for January and February 2019. Although the 2019-20 sonar deployment site is 9 river miles upstream of the 2018-19 site, we expect this year’s lower estimates are not due to the location change, but reflect a change in the run sizes.
The recent Sonar counts are well below recovery targets set for each species (Chinook, Coho, steelhead). Although the outlook isn’t great, there is reason for some hope. In the past, Benbow Damfish counts fell sharply in response to the 1954 and 1964 floods on the South Fork Eel River; yet the populations were eventually able to return in stronger numbers. The amazing resilience of salmon and steelhead means that we still have the capacity to rebuild these populations, if we act wisely.
Here’s a weekly count comparison with last year. With a late start to the rainy season in both years of operation, the first pulse of fish makes up a large portion of the total run. Information like this is key to understanding the fish we’re trying to save.
Julian Week | 2018-2019 | 2019-2020 |
11/12-11/18 | 0 | 0 |
11/19-11/25 | 1209 | 48 |
11/26-12/2 | 634 | 683 |
12/3-12/9 | 503 | 784 |
12/10-12/16 | 872 | 252 |
12/17-12/23 | 209 | 183 |
12/24-12/31* | 405 | 303 |
1/1-1/7 | 312 | 222 |
1/8-1/14 | 460 | 311 |
1/15-1/21 | 469 | 201 |
1/22-1/28 | 506 | 183 |
1/29-2/4 | 487 | 285 |
2/5-2/11 | 317 | 149 |
2/12-2/18 | 109 | 356 |
2/19-2/25 | 436 | 242 |
2/26-3/4** | 483 | 278 |
3/5-3/11 | 258 |
Table 1. Comparison of weekly passage estimates of salmonids over 40cm total length for the South Fork Eel River. Estimates for the 2019-20 season are preliminary. A “*” indicates an 8-day Julian week; a “**” indicates an 8-day Julian week in leap years.
Further Reading
Redheaded Blackbelt. “Fall Chinook Salmon Run in Eel River Estimated to have Dipped Below 10,000 Fish for the First Time Science ERRP Began Assessments in 2012.” April 17th, 2020
Sign up to hear from California Trout! CalTrout’s mission is to ensure healthy waters and resilient wild fish for a better California. Hear about our work and how to get involved through our monthly newsletter, The Streamkeeper’s Blog, “Trout Clout” action alerts, article from our e-magazine, The Current, event invites, and much more! We respect your privacy and will never sell or share your information with other organizations.
Peter Moyle is the Distinguished Professor Emeritus in the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology and Associate Director of the Center for Watershed Sciences, at UC Davis. He is author or co-author of more than 240 publications, including the definitive Inland Fishes of California (2002). He is co-author of the 2017 book, Floodplains: Processes and Management for Ecosystem Services. His research interests include conservation of aquatic species, habitats, and ecosystems, including salmon; ecology of fishes of the San Francisco Estuary; ecology of California stream fishes; impact of introduced aquatic organisms; and use of floodplains by fish.
Robert Lusardi is the California Trout/UC Davis Wild and Coldwater Fish Researcher focused on establishing the basis for long-term science specific to California Trout’s wild and coldwater fish initiatives. His work bridges the widening gap between academic science and applied conservation policy, ensuring that rapidly developing science informs conservation projects throughout California. Dr. Lusardi resides at the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences and works closely with Dr. Peter Moyle on numerous projects to help inform California Trout conservation policy. His recent research interests include Coho salmon on the Shasta River, the ecology of volcanic spring-fed rivers, inland trout conservation and management, and policy implications of trap and haul programs for anadromous fishes in California.
Patrick Samuel is the Conservation Program Coordinator for California Trout, a position he has held for almost two years, where he coordinates special research projects for California Trout, including the State of the Salmonids report. Prior to joining CalTrout, he worked with the Fisheries Leadership & Sustainability Forum, a non-profit that supports the eight federal regional fishery management councils around the country. Patrick got his start in fisheries as an undergraduate intern with NOAA Fisheries Protected Resources Division in Sacramento, and in his first field job as a crew member of the California Department of Fish & Wildlife’s Wild and Heritage Trout Program.
4 Comments
The optimism regarding possible higher Salmon populations in the South Fork Eel River is comforting but, I’m wondering what Climate Change effects might play a part in future runs.
Salmon runs should be higher on South Fork Eel River (SFER) in the future. Here are a few reasons for future optimism.
1. Benbow Dam has been removed on SFER.
2. Habitat restoration is still occurring on SFER and tributaries.
3. Massive sediment deposits brought on by the 1964 Floods are still affecting the SFER. From satellite pictures it looks like these sediment deposits from 1964 are centered around Miranda, CA. Main stem Eel River and SFER confluence still have massive 1964 sediment deposits as well.
4. This years low salmon count is probably occurring at the tale end of the multi year drought California went through from 2012-2015. We should see better numbers next year.
Finally, the great news is we haven’t lost our salmon. It took 150 years of logging, mining, dam building, development, massive landslides like in 1964 for our North Coast Rivers to get to this point of depleted salmon runs. Yet, all is not lost. We are removing outdated dams, fixing riparian habitat, planting trees to help stabilize hillsides, planting trees to provide shade to stream-banks, removing and updating outdated culverts, etc. It may take another 150-200 years to truly help our salmon runs. Ocean conditions are another matter. Smile, our salmon runs as of yet haven’t vanished. There is still hope.
Unless something is done to remove the pikeminnow and control water diversions from the watershed, the Eel river is doomed.