CalTrout News
Tuesday’s meeting with the Governor. CalTrout’s Curtis Knight seated far left
CalTrout has been actively involved over the past few weeks, and especially over the last couple of days, in the water bond negotiations. On Tuesday, Curtis Knight, CalTrout’s Conservation Director, was in Sacramento as part of a diverse group that met with the Governor to put forth a water bond proposal.
After final negotiations last night, the Governor and legislative leadership voted on and approved a $7.545 billion bond. The ongoing severe drought in California underscores the need to invest in innovative, long-term solutions to California’s water future. CalTrout believes the Water Bond of 2014 provides the right balance of investment to facilitate sustainable water management in California. Here are some highlights…
- $1.495 billion—Protecting Rivers, Lakes, Streams, Coastal Waters and Watersheds
The Water Bond will support priority on-the-ground watershed restoration work, with funding distributed in a way that will ensure an equitable investment of these funds across the state, from our coastal wetlands to our inland rivers, lakes and streams. Funding will go to existing conservancies and for the first time ever the Department of Fish and Wildlife will receive allocated funding. It provides funding for the state’s obligation for Klamath dam removal ($250 million), fish passage, addressing impacts of climate change, watershed restoration projects, land acquisition and instream flow enhancements (acquisition of water rights). - $810 million—Regional Water Security, Climate, and Drought Preparedness
Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM), including funding for water recycling, groundwater management, water supply and other projects. While CalTrout has had mixed success working within the IRWM framework, we recognize the value of this program, and support inclusion of significant funds for its continuation. CalTrout is actively involved in IRWM projects in the Eastern Sierra. - $2.7 billion—Statewide water System Operational Improvement and Drought Preparedness
This is water storage which could potentially lead to new dams and was the sticking point for many Republicans. They wanted $3 billion for Los Voqueros Reservoir expansion, building Temperence Flat (on San Joaquin above Millerton Reservoir) and Sites Reservoir (off channel storage west of Colusa in Central Valley). To build any of these surface storage project would also require a substantial user (water districts, irrigations districts) pay match.The Water Storage provision remains the most controversial for CalTrout. We remain concerned about how and where water storage dollars will be appropriated. We understand priorities for where to spend these dollars are on two projects—an expansion of Los Vaqueros Reservoir in the East Bay and newly constructed Sites Reservoir, an off channel reservoir west of I-5 in the Sacramento Valley. The other project that gets mentioned is Temperance Flat, a new dam just above Millerton Reservoir (Friant Dam) on the San Joaquin.
These funds can also be used for groundwater storage, conjunctive use and reservoir re-operations—important points we lobbied for. Groundwater storage has huge potential and needed to part of this mix.
- $725 million—Water Recycling
This section was very important to Southern California legislators—storm water runoff, salt water intrusion mitigation, etc. - $900 million—Groundwater Sustainability
Another important section that provides funding to implement groundwater reform legislation we are actively supporting. Groundwater treatment, storage and sustainable management. Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater supplies is critical to preparing for future droughts in California. The Water Bond is coordinated with pending groundwater management reform legislation. - $520 million—Clean, Safe and Reliable Drinking Water
- $395 million—Flood Management
We worked hard on this section to make it not just about levees. We secured language that calls for projects to be multi-benefit projects—public safety and river healthy. This ties into our work at Knagg’s Ranch and provides potential funding for future floodplain projects.
During drought times we need to find collaborative solutions that work for people and fish. Trout, steelhead and salmon are important indicators of watershed health and are important drivers of many rural and coastal economies. Work done to improve the status of these species directly benefits safe drinking water supplies, water quality, and the economic health of all Californians. We believe this water bond is a step in that direction.
4 Comments
There is too much foggy verbiage here– and although Cal Trout negotiates for certain language the politicians don’t always adhere (see history). In any case I’d like to see a link to a draft of the bill. Why do we need more reservoirs? Why aren’t we already prepared for droughts? Didn’t Gov. Brown finish his father’s pet project, The California Water Project (the most expensive water project in the history of mankind at the time), during his first go around? What did that do for us? No more reservoirs. Write a new bill to restore the rivers, leave the consolation prizes out and I’ll write a comment with less rhetorical questions. If you’re interested in the calamity of Jerry Brown and water projects read Marc Reisner’s book, Cadillac Desert.
While this is the most convincing breakdown I’ve seen since I heard of this bill, I’d like someone with more knowledge to expand on why we need the Los Vaqueros expansion and the Sites reservoir. Thanks
Great comment Kip. Cadillac Desert is an excellent book and I too highly recommend it. Once you start reading it, putting it down is very, very difficult. Gov. Jerry Brown wants his OWN pet project to be remembered for = the 2 IMMENSELY HUGE water diversion tunnels in the Delta that will carry water AWAY FROM THE DELTA (where the water is needed to flush the system to keep it from becoming too stagnant) and TO the length of the San Joaquin Valley, setting off another “Chinatown” type of land grab and control of water resources from Turlock south to beyond Fresno … the mega-agricultural powers-that-be already poisoned the San Joaquin Valley ONCE BEFORE with short-sighted, greed-inspired agricultural practices … I say NO MORE WATER FOR YOU! KEEP THE WATER IN OUR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVERS! … the mega-agriculture of the San Joaquin Valley had the chance to use sprinkler systems and other water saving devices, but they refused … the soil in the San Joaquin Valley is STILL toxic with chemicals that the valley’s agricultural giants misused and abused.
The vast majority of the scam of a bond is for dam construction, upgrades and expansions. This is not acceptable. What good is a larger reservoir if it doesn’t rain? Building more and bigger dams isn’t protect our rivers and streams, Cal Trout. We need to go full throttle on water conservation, reuse and recycling. There’s nothing here about mandated maximum usage nor increased water efficiency for large, corporate desert farms and ranches. We spend millions of dollars to fish habitat restoration and BILLIONS on it’s destruction. And Cal Trout supports this? Seriously?
Cal Trout still supports this bill? Jerry Brown must of paid you guys off!!