Note: This Op-Ed was recently published in several newspapers.
On Tuesday, the State Water Resources Control Board voted 5-0 to continue PacifiCorp’s water quality certificate abeyance, making it clear the rush to declare the Klamath River’s settlement agreements dead is premature.
Especially given the odd bedfellows created by the premature call for a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) solution.
The Hoopa Tribe wanted the abeyance lifted and FERC to re-engage so the dams would come down faster. Meanwhile, Siskiyou County wanted the abeyance lifted and FERC involved because they believe it’s the best way to save the dams.
Siskiyou County is playing a dangerous game. Their legal argument for keeping the dams has been shot full of holes, and one wonders how much more money they’re willing to spend defending a position that effectively removes the county from discussions while costing its citizens jobs and potentially higher electrical rates.
Sadly, Siskiyou County is trying to usher the dam relicensing process toward the worst possible conclusion. Under a FERC decommissioning the county would receive nothing, the lawsuits over water and restoration would continue and the dams may eventually come out anyway because removing them is less expensive than retrofitting them. And if the county gets its wish and the dams stay in, the vast majority of Siskiyou County ratepayers who are PacifiCorp customers will end up paying more for electricity, according to the company and the California Public Utilities Commission. Under the settlement agreement PacifiCorp ratepayers’ obligations are capped at $200 million. Absent the agreements ratepayers costs are certain to go up as all other alternatives are more expensive for PacifiCorp and the ratepayers.
That would be a terrible deal for Siskiyou County, especially considering the estimated 4,600 jobs that would be generated by the settlement agreements. Siskiyou County should rethink the impact their head-in-the-sand approach will have on county residents (like landowners around Copco Lake, who have been especially poorly represented) and instead engage with the process to ensure county residents are better represented.
As for the Hoopa Tribe’s position, we understand the desire to remove the dams quickly, but a return to the clumsy, divisive FERC process guarantees a long and contentious path to dam removal — if dam removal at all. FERC has never ordered dam removal and setting the legal precedent for them to do so could take decades.
The settlement agreements represent the quickest path to dam removal, clean water, healthy fish returns and community health in the Klamath Basin.
Fixing problems before they blossom into full-blown disasters — like the 2002 fish kill or the 2001 irrigation water shutoff — is always cheaper than repairing them after the fact; eliminating the cyclical emergency responses — and their attendant, unanticipated costs — is a key goal of the settlement agreements.
It’s true the two bills that would fully implement the settlement agreements will likely not be acted on this year, but in a wildly partisan Congress deadlocked over even the tiniest issues, the only things that made any progress at all were bile and rancor.
Meanwhile, the implementation of the settlement agreements continues. PacifiCorp is investing in meaningful interim measures to improve habitat, water quality and flows.
The dam removal trust account sits at $35 million and is growing by over $1 million per month. All these benefits go away if PacifiCorp and settlement parties are forced back to the FERC process.
The settlement agreements represent a solution to the Klamath Basin’s water and fish problems negotiated by citizens and stakeholders with skin in the game, not a distant, dysfunctional Congress or a faceless bureaucracy.
Abandoning the settlements because of the foolish actions — or inaction in this case — of a few politicians isn’t just pointless; it’s also a surrender to the lack of progress, fish kills, irrigation water shutdowns, lawsuits and fighting of the past.
Curtis Knight is California Trout’s conservation director for California Trout. He lives in Mount Shasta.
Complete the form below to be added to our volunteer database, with options to choose your interest areas and availability. You’ll be added to our volunteer mailing list and notified when there are opportunities in your region. Commitment levels vary, with some opportunities requiring more in depth training, while others you only need to show up.
Thank you for your interest in the Eel River Forum! We looking forward to sharing meeting updates and other info from the Eel River watershed with you as they develop.
Sign up to hear from California Trout! CalTrout’s mission is to ensure healthy waters and resilient wild fish for a better California. Hear about our work and how to get involved through our monthly newsletter, The Streamkeeper’s Blog, “Trout Clout” action alerts, article from our e-magazine, The Current, event invites, and much more! We respect your privacy and will never sell or share your information with other organizations.
Thank you for your interest in Big Chico Creek and the Iron Canyon Fish Passage Project! We looking forward to sharing project updates, news, and stories with you from the Big Chico Creek watershed as they develop.
Thank you for your interest in Big Chico Creek and the Iron Canyon Fish Passage Project! One of our staff members will do their best to get back to you as soon as possible. However, please note that due to limited capacity we may not be able to respond to all questions or fulfill all requests.
Let us know if you are interested in volunteering and we will get in contact with you as soon as we can.
Thank you for your interest in the Elk River! One of our North Coast Region staff members will do their best to get back to you as soon as possible. However, please note that due to limited capacity we may not be able to respond to all questions or fulfill all requests.
Peter Moyle is the Distinguished Professor Emeritus in the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology and Associate Director of the Center for Watershed Sciences, at UC Davis. He is author or co-author of more than 240 publications, including the definitive Inland Fishes of California (2002). He is co-author of the 2017 book, Floodplains: Processes and Management for Ecosystem Services. His research interests include conservation of aquatic species, habitats, and ecosystems, including salmon; ecology of fishes of the San Francisco Estuary; ecology of California stream fishes; impact of introduced aquatic organisms; and use of floodplains by fish.
Robert Lusardi is the California Trout/UC Davis Wild and Coldwater Fish Researcher focused on establishing the basis for long-term science specific to California Trout’s wild and coldwater fish initiatives. His work bridges the widening gap between academic science and applied conservation policy, ensuring that rapidly developing science informs conservation projects throughout California. Dr. Lusardi resides at the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences and works closely with Dr. Peter Moyle on numerous projects to help inform California Trout conservation policy. His recent research interests include Coho salmon on the Shasta River, the ecology of volcanic spring-fed rivers, inland trout conservation and management, and policy implications of trap and haul programs for anadromous fishes in California.
Patrick Samuel is the Conservation Program Coordinator for California Trout, a position he has held for almost two years, where he coordinates special research projects for California Trout, including the State of the Salmonids report. Prior to joining CalTrout, he worked with the Fisheries Leadership & Sustainability Forum, a non-profit that supports the eight federal regional fishery management councils around the country. Patrick got his start in fisheries as an undergraduate intern with NOAA Fisheries Protected Resources Division in Sacramento, and in his first field job as a crew member of the California Department of Fish & Wildlife’s Wild and Heritage Trout Program.